Michigan House Bill HB5017

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/19/23
• Refer: 9/19/23
• Report Pass: 10/17/23

Caption

Corrections: other; reentry services and support for certain individuals after resentencing; require. Amends sec. 83 of 1953 PA 232 (MCL 791.283).

Impact

The implications of HB5017 are significant as it proposes enhancements to the resources available for prisoners in a vulnerable position, particularly those who have faced legal injustices. By ensuring that these individuals receive similar reentry services as parolees, the bill acknowledges the challenges faced during reintegration into the community after incarceration. However, this security comes with a caveat; if the individual's conviction is reinstated, they are required to repay the costs associated with the services rendered during their time of discharge, potentially placing an additional financial burden on them.

Summary

House Bill 5017 seeks to amend Michigan's Corrections Code of 1953, specifically focusing on the provisions related to prisoners who have been discharged from custody prior to their maximum discharge date. The bill mandates that individuals who are released without parole—due to their conviction being reversed, vacated, or overturned—are entitled to receive specific reentry services. These services include transitional housing for a limited duration, assistance in obtaining vital documents, and other forms of support aimed at aiding their reintegration into society.

Contention

One noteworthy aspect of the bill that may lead to debate centers around the requirement for repayment of the provided services. Critics might argue that imposing financial liabilities on individuals who have already faced considerable adversity could hinder their reintegration process. Furthermore, the necessity of determining eligibility for services and the management of these resources could create operational complexities for the corrections department. The provision for transitional housing and vital documents illustrates a proactive approach but also raises questions regarding the adequacy of funding and resources to support the initiatives outlined in the bill.