In forgery and fraudulent practices, providing for the offense of benefit transfer device fraud.
Impact
If enacted, HB 387 will amend existing statutes in Title 18 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes to address the issue of benefit transfer fraud specifically relating to unauthorized aliens. By imposing felony charges, the legislation aims to deter fraudulent activities associated with public benefits, potentially impacting the legal landscape surrounding state and local benefits distribution. The bill’s emphasis on penalizing unauthorized access to state-mediated benefits suggests a move towards stricter regulation and enforcement in benefit allocation.
Summary
House Bill 387 introduces the offense of benefit transfer device fraud into Pennsylvania's forgery and fraudulent practices laws. The bill defines the crime as committed by persons who are unauthorized aliens found in possession of or using a benefit transfer device, specifically focusing on the Pennsylvania ACCESS card and electronic benefit transfer cards. Each instance of possession or use of such devices constitutes a separate offense, and violations are classified as felonies of the third degree, which carries significant legal implications for offenders.
Sentiment
The sentiment around HB 387 appears mixed, with supporters advocating for tighter security measures against fraud in public benefits, viewing the bill as a necessary step to protect state resources. However, there are concerns about the implications this bill may have for marginalized communities, particularly regarding access to vital assistance programs. Opponents may argue that it could lead to racial profiling or unjust legal consequences for individuals who might be incorrectly identified as unauthorized aliens.
Contention
Notable points of contention revolve around the bill's potential impact on vulnerable populations. Critics of HB 387 highlight the risk of disproportionately affecting low-income individuals and families who rely on benefit transfer devices for essential needs. There are fears that the stringent penalties would discourage individuals from seeking necessary assistance due to fear of repercussions, fostering an environment where people may avoid benefiting from programs they're legally entitled to.