Wisconsin Senate Bill SJR72

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/29/23
• Refer: 9/29/23
• Engrossed: 10/17/23
• Refer: 11/8/23
• Passed: 1/30/24

Caption

Supporting the people of Iran in their quest for a democratic government.

Impact

Passing SJR72 would signify a strong stance taken by the Wisconsin Legislature against violations of human rights by the Iranian government. The resolution condemns both past and ongoing state-sponsored terrorism and human rights abuses perpetrated by the Iranian authorities. It communicates solidarity with Iranian citizens who are advocating against the authoritarian regime, therefore elevating the dialogue on international human rights within the context of state-level governance.

Summary

SJR72 is a resolution introduced in the Wisconsin Legislature that expresses support for the people of Iran in their struggle for a democratic government. The resolution outlines the ongoing protests that have surged across Iran, particularly in the aftermath of the death of Mahsa Amini, a young woman who became a symbol of resistance against oppressive laws enforced by the Iranian regime. The protests, rooted in frustration over decades of repression, highlight the calls for fundamental rights and freedoms, emphasizing the role of women in leading these movements.

Conclusion

Overall, SJR72 serves as both a declaration of Wisconsin's alignment with democratic values and a reflection of the collective moral responsibility to support those fighting for freedom against oppression. By uniting in support of the Iranian people's quest for a democratic government, Wisconsin lawmakers are taking a stand for universal human rights, reinforcing the vision of a just and equitable society.

Contention

While the resolution is largely supportive, it may face contention from those who argue about the appropriateness of U.S. states commenting on foreign political matters. Some critics may view it as an interference in international politics, while proponents advocate that such support is vital in the global fight for democracy and human rights. Discussions surrounding the implications of foreign policy within a state's legislative scope could arise as the resolution is debated.