Kentucky Senate Bill SB282

Kentucky 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/21/23
• Refer: 2/21/23
• Refer: 2/23/23
• Report Pass: 3/2/23
• Engrossed: 3/13/23
• Refer: 3/13/23
• Refer: 3/30/23
• Report Pass: 3/30/23
• Enrolled: 3/30/23
• Chaptered: 4/4/23
• Passed: 4/4/23

Caption

AN ACT relating to victims of crime, making an appropriation therefor, and declaring an emergency.

Impact

In addition to expanding eligibility, the bill also establishes new limits on compensation amounts and mandates that claims be submitted within a specific timeframe. The Crime Victims Compensation Board is tasked with overseeing these claims and has the authority to deny claims where there is a lack of cooperation with law enforcement. This approach is designed to streamline the compensation process while ensuring that taxpayers' funds used for victim support are appropriately managed.

Summary

SB282 focuses on enhancing the compensation available to victims of crime in Kentucky. The bill makes significant amendments to the definitions and eligibility criteria under the Kentucky Revised Statutes pertaining to crime victims' compensation. Notably, it clarifies definitions of 'victim' and 'criminally injurious conduct,' expanding the scope of who can claim compensation and under what circumstances. The legislation aims to ensure that individuals harmed by crime receive sufficient financial support to assist with medical expenses, lost wages, and funeral costs if necessary.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB282 appears overwhelmingly positive, particularly among advocacy groups dedicated to supporting victims of crime. Supporters argue that the bill is a crucial step in recognizing the needs and rights of victims, ensuring that they are compensated fairly for their suffering. However, some concern has been raised regarding the strict criteria for claims and the potential burden it may place on victims who are already coping with the aftermath of violent incidents.

Contention

Despite its positive reception, there are contention points related to the definitions provided in the bill, especially regarding the constraints on when a claim can be made. Critics express concern that limiting the compensation eligibility timeframe to 48 hours may pose challenges for victims, particularly in cases where there are valid reasons for delays in reporting. This element of the bill has sparked debates about balancing efficiency in processing claims with the importance of accessibility for all victims.