Pennsylvania House Bill HB427

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/15/23
• Refer: 3/15/23

Caption

Providing for an index relating to diagnosis, maintenance and repair of digital electronic equipment and for enforcement by Attorney General.

Impact

The implications of this bill on state laws are significant, as it seeks to establish clearer guidelines for manufacturers regarding the maintenance and repair of electronic products sold in Pennsylvania. By standardizing the disclosure of repairability information, the bill aims to empower consumers and promote sustainability by potentially reducing electronic waste. The enforcement of the act by the Attorney General aims to protect consumers from false claims, thereby creating a more transparent market environment.

Summary

House Bill 427, known as the Repairability Index Act, aims to enhance consumer protection by mandating that original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) provide a repairability score for digital electronic equipment. This score, ranging from 1 to 10, will assess how easy it is for consumers or technicians to maintain and repair the equipment. The act requires detailed information regarding various aspects such as the duration of technical support, ease of dismantling, and availability of replacement parts, which must be disclosed to consumers at the point of sale.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HB 427 appears to be supportive among consumer advocacy groups, who see it as a positive step towards greater accountability from manufacturers. Proponents argue that providing consumers with a clear understanding of repairability will help them make informed purchasing decisions, ultimately fostering a culture of sustainability. However, there are concerns about how manufacturers will adapt to these requirements and whether they will lead to increased costs for consumers or hinder innovation in product development.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential resistance from manufacturers who may view this regulation as burdensome or restrictive. There may also be debates regarding the effectiveness of the repairability score itself, especially in terms of how accurately it can reflect the repairability of complex digital products. Additionally, questions may arise around the implications for manufacturers who fail to comply with these new standards, including possible penalties enforced by the Attorney General's office.