If enacted, HM43 would lead to the formation of an interim administrative rule oversight committee composed of twelve members, appointed by the majority and minority floor leaders from both the House and Senate. This committee would be tasked with meeting at least monthly to review proposed rules, analyze their fiscal implications, and recommend necessary modifications or support for legislative amendments to clarify the rulemaking process. This legislative oversight could potentially enhance the transparency and accountability of state agency rulemaking, striving to better reflect the laws passed by the legislature.
Summary
House Memorial 43 (HM43) proposes the establishment of an interim committee focused on the oversight of state agency rules. This initiative is motivated by the recognition that state agencies derive their rulemaking authority from statutes enacted by the legislature, which may sometimes lead to discrepancies between the actual rules and the intended legislative framework. The resolution aims to create a structured approach for the review of agency rules to ensure alignment with legislative intent and provide a mechanism for ongoing oversight and public engagement.
Contention
Notably, HM43 highlights concerns regarding the costs and complexities associated with challenging state agency rules in court. By instituting a review process before public hearings, the bill seeks to address these challenges, promoting a collaborative approach between legislative entities and executive agencies. While proponents may argue that this process can reduce administrative burdens and ensure clarity in rulemaking, there may be contention from those who view it as an increased bureaucratic layer that could slow down the rulemaking process. Stakeholders will need to consider how this oversight might affect the agencies' capacity to respond swiftly to emerging needs or issues in governance.