Wisconsin Assembly Bill AB746

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/6/23
• Refer: 12/6/23
• Failed: 4/15/24

Caption

BadgerCare purchase option, basic plan, state-based insurance exchange, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Impact

The bill mandates DHS to develop a basic health plan compliant with the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, paving the way for a state-based insurance exchange. The exchange will facilitate individuals' access to affordable coverage options, promoting better healthcare provisions across Wisconsin. By enabling greater access through the BadgerCare option, the legislation seeks to alleviate the financial burden on individuals while enhancing public health in underserved populations. The establishment of a purchase program will also allow small groups to buy into BadgerCare, which may stabilize coverage for local businesses and their employees.

Summary

Assembly Bill 746 aims to enhance healthcare accessibility in Wisconsin by introducing a purchase option for individuals with incomes above BadgerCare eligibility limits. The bill directs the Department of Health Services (DHS) to seek necessary federal waivers and amendments to allow certain individuals to purchase BadgerCare coverage. Notably, it allows for coverage up to 200 percent of the federal poverty line, making it more inclusive for low-income residents who do not qualify for existing Medicaid programs. This potential expansion is anticipated to improve health outcomes for many individuals struggling to afford health insurance.

Contention

Despite its intended benefits, there are notable points of contention surrounding AB746. Proponents argue it represents a vital step toward expanding healthcare access, especially amid rising health insurance costs. Conversely, critics worry that the reliance on federal waivers may create uncertainty and disrupt existing Medicaid funding mechanisms. Additionally, concerns surrounding the program's long-term financial sustainability and potential impacts on state budgets have been raised by opponents. As the bill moves forward, discussions will be critical in addressing these issues and optimizing its implementation.