If adopted, AJR99 would significantly impact the succession protocols for public offices within Wisconsin. It mandates the legislature to create a framework for prompt and temporary succession, ensuring that the powers and duties of unavailable public officials can be transferred effectively during emergencies. This change reflects a proactive stance towards managing unforeseen crises that could impair government function, thereby enhancing the resilience of local and state governance.
Summary
AJR99 is a proposed constitutional amendment that aims to modify Section 34 of Article IV of the Wisconsin Constitution. The amendment broadens the circumstances under which the state legislature must ensure continuity of government. Currently, the provision addresses emergencies specifically resulting from an enemy attack; however, AJR99 extends this to include any emergency situation which may render public officers unavailable to fulfill their duties. The intent is to maintain governmental operations during various emergencies, thereby preventing potential disruptions in governance.
Contention
One notable point of contention surrounding AJR99 revolves around the scope of the term 'emergency.' Critics are concerned that the broad definition could lead to abuses, where the legislature might exploit ambiguous emergency situations to justify changes in leadership or governance. Supporters argue that the need for flexibility in responding to emergencies outweighs these concerns, as it enables a swift and effective government response when necessary. The amendment requires ratification by two successive legislatures and by the public, which may lead to further debate and discussion as the bill progresses through the legislative process.