Pennsylvania Senate Bill SB200

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/8/23
• Refer: 5/8/23

Caption

In firearms and other dangerous articles, providing for assault weapons and large capacity magazines and establishing the Firearms and Ammunition Buyback Program and the Pennsylvania State Police Buyback Fund.

Impact

The bill is significant as it directly alters existing state laws regarding firearms, enforcing stricter regulations on assault weapons. By requiring a certificate of possession, it adds a layer of bureaucracy intended to enhance public safety while allowing existing owners a means to legally keep their firearms under specific conditions. Additionally, the establishment of a buyback program could encourage voluntary compliance from gun owners looking to dispose of potentially dangerous weapons.

Summary

Senate Bill 200 focuses on regulating assault weapons and large capacity magazines within Pennsylvania. The bill prohibits possession, manufacture, import, sale, or transfer of these firearms, with certain exceptions for law enforcement and military personnel. Individuals who own such weapons prior to the bill's enactment must apply for a certificate of possession, which allows them to retain control under regulated conditions. The bill also establishes a Firearms and Ammunition Buyback Program aimed at reducing the number of such weapons in circulation by providing monetary compensation for their surrender.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB200 appears to be polarized. Proponents see it as a necessary step toward reducing gun violence and improving community safety by taking high-capacity firearms off the streets. Conversely, many opponents argue that such regulations infringe upon Second Amendment rights and express concern over the government's overreach in firearm ownership and management. The debate reflects broader national conversations about gun control and individual rights.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the methods by which the bill enforces regulation, particularly the certification process and the buyback program. Critics are concerned about the potential for misuse of power in revoking certificates of possession and the bureaucratic hurdles that could make it difficult for law-abiding gun owners to navigate. Additionally, while the bill makes provisions for buybacks, there are questions regarding how effective these programs will be in actually reducing the number of assault weapons in circulation.