Pennsylvania Senate Bill SB200

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/3/25
• Refer: 6/3/25

Caption

In firearms and other dangerous articles, providing for assault weapons and large capacity magazines and establishing the Firearms and Ammunition Buyback Program and the Pennsylvania State Police Buyback Fund; imposing duties on the Pennsylvania State Police; and imposing penalties.

Impact

If passed, SB200 will significantly alter existing laws governing firearms in Pennsylvania, specifically targeting assault weapons and magazines capable of holding more than ten rounds. The law mandates that those who currently possess such items must either surrender them or obtain a certificate of possession within a specified timeframe. This act may face opposition regarding enforcement and the implications for those who own firearms classified under this legislation, particularly hunters and shooting enthusiasts who may possess firearms for recreational purposes.

Summary

Senate Bill 200 (SB200) aims to amend Title 18 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes by introducing regulations concerning the possession, manufacture, sale, or transfer of assault weapons and large capacity magazines. The bill establishes a requirement for owners of such weapons to obtain a certificate of possession from the Pennsylvania State Police, effectively creating a new regulatory framework intended to enhance public safety. Additionally, it includes penalties for non-compliance and establishes a Firearms and Ammunition Buyback Program to facilitate the surrender of prohibited firearms.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding SB200 appears to be polarized. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step towards addressing gun violence in the state by regulating access to high-capacity firearms. Conversely, opponents see it as an infringement on Second Amendment rights, expressing concerns that it may unfairly penalize responsible gun owners and erode personal freedoms regarding firearm ownership.

Contention

Several points of contention arise with SB200, particularly surrounding the definitions of assault weapons and the practicality of the buyback program. Critics argue that the definition may be overly broad and could include many common firearms used by lawful citizens. The financial implications of the buyback program, in terms of its funding and sustainability, also raise questions. Additionally, enforcement issues regarding verifying compliance with the new regulations may lead to significant challenges for law enforcement agencies.