Kentucky House Bill HJR40

Kentucky 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/11/24
• Refer: 1/11/24

Caption

A JOINT RESOLUTION applying for an Article V convention to propose amendments to the Constitution of the United States that impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limit the terms of office for federal government officials and members of Congress.

Impact

If enacted, HJR40 would initiate a significant shift in the balance of power between state and federal authorities. It aims to encourage other states to join in this call for a convention, potentially leading to a nationwide movement advocating for the proposed amendments. These fiscal restraints are perceived as a means to reduce national debt and tighten government spending, which supporters claim would enhance economic stability and accountability within the federal administration.

Summary

HJR40 is a joint resolution that seeks to apply for a convention under Article V of the U.S. Constitution. The primary goal of this resolution is to propose amendments aimed at imposing fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting its power and jurisdiction, and establishing term limits for federal government officials and members of Congress. Advocates for this resolution assert that it is necessary to safeguard state sovereignty and protect citizens from overreach by the federal government.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HJR40 appears to be largely supportive among those favoring greater state control over federal authority. Proponents believe that such amendments are vital for restoring a balance that has been skewed over time. Conversely, there are concerns from critics regarding the potential consequences of such amendments, including the fear that they could lead to unintended limitations on necessary federal functions, thus igniting a contentious debate on the viability and necessity of such changes.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the apprehensions surrounding the implications of convening a constitutional convention. Opponents highlight the risks of opening the Constitution to amendments that may be detrimental or misaligned with public interests. The call for term limits also sparks debate regarding the efficacy of such limits and whether they would genuinely improve governmental function or merely introduce instability and inexperience among federal representation.