Kentucky Senate Bill SJR78

Kentucky 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/10/23
• Refer: 2/10/23
• Refer: 2/17/23

Caption

A JOINT RESOLUTION applying for an Article V convention to propose amendments to the Constitution of the United States that impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limit the terms of office for federal government officials and members of Congress.

Impact

If enacted, SJR78 would not immediately change existing state laws, but it would play a significant role in the long-term effort to reshape the federal system of governance. By applying for an Article V convention, Kentucky seeks to join other states in a collective movement that could lead to substantial amendments to the Constitution. This could potentially lead to a reevaluation of the balance of power between federal and state governments, impacting legislative authority and regulatory frameworks at both levels.

Summary

SJR78 is a joint resolution proposing the application for an Article V convention aimed at amending the United States Constitution. The primary focus of the resolution is to impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit its power and jurisdiction, and put forth term limits for federal officials and members of Congress. This initiative is rooted in the belief that state legislatures serve as protectors of individual liberties against federal overreach, particularly in the face of rising national debt and perceived encroachments of state rights by federal mandates.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SJR78 appears to be supportive among proponents who argue that it is a necessary step to curb federal excesses and restore the autonomy of state governments. Advocates view it as a proactive measure that empowers states to reclaim rights that they believe have been usurped by the federal government. Conversely, opposition may arise from those concerned about the risks associated with a constitutional convention, including the potential for unforeseen changes to the Constitution that could undermine existing protections.

Contention

One notable point of contention revolves around the risks associated with calling a constitutional convention. Critics worry that such a convention could lead to a 'runaway convention,' where delegates might propose amendments that go far beyond fiscal restraints and limitations on federal power. This raises concerns about the fragility and integrity of longstanding constitutional protections, signaling a need for a balance between necessary reforms and the potential for unintended consequences.