Kentucky Senate Bill SJR58

Kentucky 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/13/25
• Refer: 2/13/25
• Refer: 2/18/25

Caption

A JOINT RESOLUTION applying for an Article V convention to propose amendments to the Constitution of the United States that impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limit the terms of office for federal government officials and members of Congress.

Impact

If enacted, SJR58 could have significant implications for state-federal relations. The proposed amendments would seek to enhance state authority in governance by curbing federal influence, a move highly welcomed by advocates of states' rights. Limited terms for Congress members could also reshape congressional dynamics, potentially leading to more turnover in legislative representation and impacting long-term policy development. Additionally, the call for fiscal restraint aligns with ongoing discussions about federal budget management and accountability, resonating with constituents concerned about governmental financial practices.

Summary

SJR58 is a joint resolution proposed in the Kentucky General Assembly that applies for a convention under Article V of the U.S. Constitution. The resolution aims to propose amendments designed to impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit its power and jurisdiction, and establish term limits for federal officials and members of Congress. This action reflects a movement among state legislatures to activate Article V in order to address concerns over federal overreach and the growing national debt, which proponents argue has been facilitated by ineffective government spending and unfunded mandates imposed on states.

Sentiment

Sentiment around SJR58 appears to be strongly favorable among certain political factions, primarily those advocating for reduced federal control and enhanced state autonomy. Supporters argue that the resolution is a necessary step to reestablish balance between state and federal powers, appealing to those who feel that local governance is often undermined by overarching federal laws. However, there may also be skepticism and concern from critics who believe that such a convention could lead to unpredictable changes to the Constitution, potentially allowing for extremist views to gain traction in the national governance framework.

Contention

The resolution's most notable points of contention revolve around the risks associated with convening a constitutional convention. Detractors worry that once convened, it could lead to amendments that go beyond the intended fiscal restraints and power limitations, altering fundamental rights and protections. Additionally, the effectiveness and safety of using Article V for such drastic amendments is debated, with fears that it might destabilize established constitutional interpretations and lead to significant legal battles concerning state versus federal authority.