Wisconsin Assembly Bill AB886

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/2/24
• Refer: 1/2/24
• Failed: 4/15/24

Caption

Deer carcass disposal sites, chronic wasting disease education, and making an appropriation. (FE)

Impact

The introduction of AB886 signifies a proactive approach to wildlife management and public health within Wisconsin. By providing designated disposal sites, the bill not only addresses potential ecological concerns arising from unmanaged carcass disposal but also enhances the educational outreach regarding chronic wasting disease. Financial appropriations within the bill support the establishment and maintenance of these disposal sites, crucial for protecting both wildlife and human health. By tackling these issues, the bill is expected to create a more structured framework for managing deer populations in relation to the increasing concerns over chronic wasting disease.

Summary

Assembly Bill 886 aims to address issues related to deer carcass disposal and educate hunters about chronic wasting disease. The bill mandates the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to provide large metal containers at various locations throughout the state where hunters can dispose of deer carcasses properly. This initiative is designed to facilitate safe and environmentally responsible disposal practices, thereby mitigating the spread of diseases associated with improper carcass management. Additionally, the bill allocates funding to support these health and environmental initiatives.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support due to its focus on ecological responsibility, there are points of contention among various stakeholders. Some critics may argue about the financial implications of maintaining the disposal sites and whether the allocated funds will be sufficient for long-term sustainability. Additionally, there could be concerns regarding the effectiveness of educational programs on chronic wasting disease, with some stakeholders potentially advocating for broader outreach initiatives. The balance between maintaining wildlife health and addressing community concerns about unnecessary expenditures remains a topic for discussion among legislators and community members.