Certain preferential treatment by local governments.
Impact
If passed, AB865 would fundamentally alter the framework of employment policies at local government levels across Wisconsin. By revising the statute to allow preferential treatment based on specified characteristics, the bill may facilitate initiatives that advocate for diversity and inclusion in local government hiring practices. However, it could also lead to contentious debates about fairness and equality, as critics might argue that it institutionalizes reverse discrimination against those not represented by the specified categories.
Summary
Assembly Bill 865 seeks to amend existing statutes concerning discriminatory practices in employment decisions made by political subdivisions. This legislation proposes the removal of the prohibition against granting preferential treatment on the grounds of race, color, ancestry, national origin, or sexual orientation, which was established in the 2023 Wisconsin Act 12. The intent behind this amendment is to allow local governments greater flexibility in handling employment and contract decisions, potentially enabling them to implement programs aimed at addressing historical inequalities.
Contention
The proposal surrounding AB865 is likely to provoke significant debate. Proponents of the bill argue that it is an essential step towards remedying systemic inequities faced by marginalized groups and that local governments need the authority to implement preferences that can help level the playing field. On the contrary, opponents of the bill might perceive this as a regression in civil rights protections, raising fears that it could lead to discriminatory practices under the guise of promoting equity. The discussions will likely center around the balance between ensuring equal opportunity and acknowledging the historical disadvantages faced by certain groups.
Discrimination in employment, housing, public accommodations, education, insurance coverage, national guard, jury duty, and adoption and in the receipt of mental health or vocational rehabilitation services.
Discrimination in employment, housing, public accommodations, education, insurance coverage, national guard, jury duty, and adoption and in the receipt of mental health or vocational rehabilitation services.