Wisconsin Senate Bill SB829

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/19/23
• Refer: 12/19/23
• Report Pass: 1/31/24
• Engrossed: 2/13/24
• Refer: 2/13/24
• Enrolled: 2/19/24
• Chaptered: 3/27/24
• Passed: 3/27/24

Caption

Allowing a tactical emergency medical services professional to carry a firearm in prohibited areas. (FE)

Impact

If enacted, SB829 would modify state statutes related to the certification of tactical emergency medical services professionals, enabling them to carry concealed firearms while on duty. This could change the dynamics of emergency medical response scenarios, particularly during high-risk operations where police presence is involved. The bill outlines rigorous certification protocols, including the requirement for prior approval from local law enforcement officials such as sheriffs or police chiefs, thus embedding a structure that ties training and operational authorization to local governance.

Summary

Senate Bill 829 aims to allow tactical emergency medical services professionals to carry firearms in areas where firearms are otherwise prohibited. This bill establishes specific definitions and requirements for tactical emergency medical services professionals, as well as stipulations regarding their certification and training. The legislation is designed to ensure that emergency medical services professionals can be better equipped to respond to emergency situations, particularly those involving law enforcement activities.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB829 appears to be mixed. Supporters argue that allowing tactical emergency medical services professionals to carry firearms enhances public safety and provides them with necessary tools to perform their jobs effectively in high-stress situations. However, opponents raise concerns about the potential for increased risks during emergency responses and question whether training standards are sufficient to ensure that these professionals are adequately prepared to carry firearms.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between enhancing public safety through better-equipped emergency services and the implications of distributing firearm rights within medical assistance teams. Critics fear that this could lead to unnecessary escalation in emergency situations, while proponents insist that properly trained professionals can make split-second decisions that ultimately save lives. The bill encapsulates a broader debate on law enforcement's role in emergency management and the integration of medical services within tactical operations.