Minnesota 2023-2024 Regular Session

Minnesota Senate Bill SF682

Introduced
1/25/23  
Refer
1/25/23  

Caption

Criminal penalty provision for substantial bodily harm caused by response for fictitious emergency

Impact

The bill significantly impacts Minnesota Statutes by setting clear legal ramifications for actions resulting in substantial bodily harm due to false emergency reports. Under the new provisions, if an emergency response is triggered by a fictitious call that leads to serious injury, the offender can face imprisonment for up to ten years and/or fines up to $20,000. For cases involving substantial bodily harm, penalties include up to three years of imprisonment and/or a fine of $10,000. This change reflects the legislature's commitment to ensuring that emergency resources are not unduly strained by deceitful reports.

Summary

SF682 is a legislative bill that aims to enhance public safety by imposing criminal penalties for individuals who cause substantial bodily harm through fictitious emergency calls. Specifically, it amends existing statutes regarding the repercussions of reporting non-existent emergencies that trigger emergency services, introducing a felony offense for severe injuries or death resulting from such actions. This legislative measure underscores the importance of responsible reporting in critical situations, aiming to deter individuals from misusing emergency services.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SF682 appears predominantly supportive among lawmakers who prioritize public safety and effective use of emergency services. Advocates for the bill highlight the necessity of addressing the growing issue of false emergency reports, which not only waste valuable resources but can also endanger lives by diverting attention from genuine emergencies. However, there may be voices of caution regarding the potential for overly harsh penalties, raising concerns about fairness and proportionality in criminal justice related to non-violent offenses.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SF682 include debates over the appropriateness of the penalties proposed. While supporters argue that the bill will serve as a strong deterrent, critics may contend that existing penalties were sufficient and that the new provisions could lead to disproportionately severe consequences for offenders who may not have intended to cause harm. Discussions also highlighted the goal of balancing stringent law enforcement with a focus on rehabilitation and education to prevent such behaviors in the first place.

Companion Bills

MN HF247

Similar To Criminal penalty established for substantial bodily harm caused by response for fictitious emergency, and restitution provided for public agencies and victims affected by reporting of fictitious emergency.

Previously Filed As

MN HF247

Criminal penalty established for substantial bodily harm caused by response for fictitious emergency, and restitution provided for public agencies and victims affected by reporting of fictitious emergency.

MN SF3372

Swatting criminal penalties expansion provision

MN HF3209

Criminal penalties for swatting increased.

MN SF3815

Felony offense establishment for reporting a fictitious emergency and directing the emergency response to the home of certain individuals

MN HF3757

Felony offense established for reporting a fictitious emergency and directing the emergency response to the home of other individuals, and conforming change made.

MN SF3515

Restitution provision for public agencies and victims affected by the reporting of a fictitious emergency

MN SF281

Coercion crime that causes great bodily harm or death of the victim criminal penalty enhancement provision

MN SF4328

Criminal penalties increase for human trafficking offenses

MN HF3621

Restitution provided for public agencies and victims affected by the reporting of a fictitious emergency.

MN SF5164

Firearms safe storage standards establishment and criminal penalties for failing to meet those standards provisions

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.