Prohibits anyone from using a hand-held electronic wireless communications device while driving a non-commercial motor vehicle unless the device is equipped for hands-free operation and is being used in that manner
Impact
The bill has the potential to significantly amend state laws governing motor vehicle operation and safety protocols. By clarifying the scope of permissible activities regarding electronic communication while driving, it lays down a framework that is consistent across non-commercial and commercial use, thus aiming to create a safer driving environment. Furthermore, the legislation requires hands-free technology, appealing to modern safety standards and technological advances.
Summary
House Bill 228 seeks to amend existing regulations regarding the use of hand-held electronic wireless communications devices while operating non-commercial motor vehicles in the state. If enacted, the bill would prohibit individuals under the age of twenty-two from using such devices to make phone calls or send text messages unless the device is equipped for hands-free operation. Additionally, it establishes comparable restrictions for operators of commercial vehicles. This aims to enhance road safety by reducing distractions caused by mobile device usage while driving.
Sentiment
Public sentiment regarding HB 228 appears to align with a growing concern over road safety, particularly involving young drivers. Supporters argue that the legislation will proactively prevent accidents caused by distracted driving, which is a pervasive issue. However, there are voices of concern regarding enforcement challenges and the potential for unwarranted penalties. Overall, proponents of the bill envision it as a vital measure for the protection of all road users.
Contention
Despite the intended safety benefits, there are notable points of contention surrounding HB 228. Opponents raise arguments about the implications on personal freedom and the effectiveness of such regulations in actually preventing accidents. There are also concerns about how the law might disproportionately target younger drivers, raising questions about fairness in punitive measures for technology use. Moreover, the preemption of local regulations raises arguments about the balance of state and local governance, where communities may have specific needs that could be overlooked by a blanket law.
Prohibits anyone from using a hand-held electronic wireless communications device while driving a non-commercial motor vehicle unless the device is equipped for hands-free operation and is being used in that manner
Prohibits the use of hand-held electronic wireless communications devices while driving noncommercial and commercial motor vehicles; but allows the use of such devices when used hands-free by operators of noncommercial motor vehicles
Prohibits the use of hand-held electronic wireless communications devices while driving non-commercial and commercial motor vehicles; but allows the use of such devices when used hands-free by operators of non-commercial motor vehicles who are fully licensed and eighteen years of age or older