Wisconsin Senate Bill SB1073

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/26/24
• Refer: 2/26/24
• Failed: 4/15/24

Caption

Requiring paint manufacturers to administer paint collection programs, granting rule-making authority, and making an appropriation. (FE)

Impact

The implications of SB1073 on state laws include the creation of new statutory requirements for paint manufacturers, who must develop and execute a stewardship plan that addresses the collection, management, and recycling of postconsumer paint. Notable components of the stewardship plan include the requirement for manufacturers to bear the costs of collection without passing immediate charges onto consumers and to ensure convenient access to collection sites for at least 90% of the state’s residents. Overall, the legislation promotes environmental responsibility while holding manufacturers accountable for the lifecycle of their products.

Summary

Senate Bill 1073 aims to establish a systematic paint collection program in Wisconsin by requiring paint manufacturers to implement a paint stewardship plan approved by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). The bill specifically defines 'paint' to encompass architectural paints in containers of five gallons or less and mandates that no paint can be sold in the state unless the manufacturer is compliant with the new regulations. This initiative is designed to facilitate the proper disposal and recycling of used paint, thereby minimizing environmental impact and promoting sustainable practices within the industry.

Contention

While SB1073 is largely seen as a positive step toward environmental sustainability, there may be some contention around its implementation. Concerns may arise regarding the added costs that manufacturers might face, which could potentially be passed onto consumers through a fee in the paint price. Additionally, the bill seeks to shield manufacturers and retailers from antitrust claims related to compliance with the stewardship plan, raising questions about competitive practices in the industry. Stakeholders may argue whether such protections should be granted and the potential implications for smaller manufacturers who might struggle to meet the bill’s requirements.