Michigan Senate Bill SB0923

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/13/24
• Refer: 6/13/24
• Report Pass: 10/8/24
• Refer: 10/8/24
• Report Pass: 10/16/24
• Engrossed: 10/16/24
• Refer: 10/17/24
• Report Pass: 12/10/24

Caption

Crimes: definitions; definition of racketeering; include embezzlement from a vulnerable adult. Amends sec. 159g of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.159g).

Impact

If enacted, this change would specifically impact legal proceedings related to financial crimes in Michigan, particularly enhancing protections for vulnerable adults who may be victimized through embezzlement. The bill amends existing statutes where various types of crimes, including those related to fraudulent activities or exploitation, were not previously explicitly categorized under racketeering. This could lead to harsher penalties for such crimes and would assist law enforcement in addressing cases that involve vulnerable populations more effectively.

Summary

Senate Bill 923 aims to amend the Michigan Penal Code by redefining the term 'racketeering' under section 159g. The most notable change introduced by this bill is the inclusion of embezzlement from vulnerable adults as part of the offenses categorized under racketeering. This amendment seeks to broaden the scope of what constitutes racketeering activities, thus strengthening the legal framework to combat financial crimes that exploit vulnerable populations.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 923 appears to be generally positive among supporters who advocate for greater protections for vulnerable adults. Legislative discussions highlight the importance of recognizing embezzlement as a serious offense that not only affects individual victims but also harms society at large. However, there may also be concerns from critics about the practical implications of enforcing such definitions and whether existing laws are not already sufficient to address these crimes.

Contention

Notable points of contention might arise regarding the interpretation and criteria for what constitutes a vulnerable adult in the context of this bill. Stakeholders, including social service agencies and legal experts, may debate the definitions employed and whether they encompass all necessary circumstances where adults may be considered vulnerable. Additionally, there might be discussions about the potential financial and administrative impact on legal systems and agencies tasked with enforcement and oversight.