Minnesota Senate Bill SF925

Minnesota 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/23
• Refer: 1/30/23

Caption

Medical assistance reimbursement for parents and spouses providing services under consumer-directed community supports and community first services and supports establishment

Impact

The bill modifies existing Minnesota Statutes relating to medical assistance for personal service provision. It establishes caps on how many hours parents can provide assistance while still being reimbursed through medical assistance programs. For example, it mandates that if both parents are providing services, they can collectively bill for 80 hours per week, but if only one parent is involved, they can bill for up to 60 hours a week. This changes the framework through which families receive support and compensation for their caregiving efforts.

Summary

Senate File 925 is a legislative proposal focused on amending Minnesota's medical assistance reimbursement policies for services provided by parents and spouses under consumer-directed community supports (CDCS) and community first services and supports (CFSS). Specifically, the bill allows parents or spouses to provide personal assistance services to their minor children and establishes specific hourly limits for these services, which aims to create a structured method for the reimbursement of such care. The initiative intends to support families who provide care, acknowledging the essential role they play in the care and support of individuals with disabilities.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support for addressing the financial burdens faced by family caregivers, some points of contention have emerged. Critics may argue that the bill could unintentionally constrain reimbursement options for families who need comprehensive care solutions. Additionally, stakeholders from various advocacy groups may express concerns about the adequacy of support and whether the limitations on hourly reimbursements could lead to under-served needs among minor children requiring care. It remains critical to balance cost-effectiveness in government support with the necessary provisions for vulnerable populations.