Michigan House Bill HB5848

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/25/24
• Refer: 6/25/24
• Report Pass: 11/13/24

Caption

Crimes: prostitution; references to prostitution; modify in the Michigan Gaming Control and Revenue Act. Amends sec. 7c of 1996 IL 1 (MCL 432.207c). TIE BAR WITH: HB 5841'24

Impact

The introduction of stringent registration requirements is expected to significantly alter the landscape of labor relations within the casino gaming industry. By requiring local labor organizations to disclose extensive background information and hold regular registrations, the bill intends to mitigate risks associated with misconduct tied to organized labor within gambling establishments. The act will potentially strengthen oversight and could reduce instances of disqualification based on criminal activity or lack of character among labor organization representatives, thereby enhancing integrity in labor negotiations for casino employees.

Summary

House Bill 5848 aims to amend the Michigan Gaming Control and Revenue Act, specifically focusing on the requirements for local labor organizations representing casino gaming employees. The bill mandates that these organizations register with the Michigan Gaming Control Board every two years, providing detailed information about their operations and personnel. This includes not only basic contact information but also sensitive data such as compensation details, home addresses, and even criminal history of designated individuals representing the labor organizations. Such transparency aims to ensure that those involved in labor organizations maintain a level of good moral character essential for the gaming industry.

Contention

Notably, some may contend that the bill imposes excessive restrictions on labor organizations, potentially affecting their ability to function effectively. Critics could argue that requiring detailed personal information and regular updates from labor organization representatives may sow distrust among employees and could deter individuals from participating in such organizations due to privacy concerns. Additionally, there is a fear that these provisions might be leveraged to undermine organized labor by establishing barriers to entry that disadvantage new or smaller labor unions. Thus, this bill has sparked debates on balancing oversight against the rights of workers and their representatives.