Recognizing and honoring members of 1857 Oregon Constitutional Convention who voted not to ratify state's founding document that included racial exclusion clause.
Impact
The resolution illustrates a significant shift in acknowledging Oregon's racist history and the long-standing impact of systemic racism on the state's demographics and social fabric. Although the racial exclusion clause was invalidated by the Fourteenth Amendment and formally removed from the constitution via a 1926 ballot measure, its historical presence has continued to influence perceptions and discussions about race relations in Oregon. By formally recognizing this historical wrongdoing, HCR16 aims to foster a deeper understanding of the past injustices faced by racially marginalized communities.
Summary
House Concurrent Resolution 16 (HCR16) recognizes and honors the courageous actions of certain members of the 1857 Oregon Constitutional Convention who voted against ratifying a state document that included a racial exclusion clause. The resolution acknowledges the exclusionary policies embedded in Oregon's legal framework historically targeted at racial minorities, including African Americans, Native Americans, and individuals of Chinese descent, by preventing their equal participation in civic life and statehood rights. Notable among these historical references is the racially exclusionary law enacted in 1844 and the subsequent establishment of the exclusion clause in the constitutional framework.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HCR16 is largely positive, with a consensus among advocates regarding the importance of confronting and teaching about Oregon’s history of racism. Legislators supporting the resolution express optimism that such recognition could lead to restorative justice initiatives and healing conversations among communities regarding past injustices. However, there could also be contention among those who believe that current agendas should look forward instead of focusing on historic grievances.
Contention
One notable point of contention in discussions surrounding HCR16 is the interpretation of historical accountability and reparations. While many support the resolution as a step toward recognition and healing, others express concerns about centering historical grievances in contemporary political discourse, arguing that it may detract from current issues faced by racial minorities. The very act of acknowledging these past injustices may evoke complex discussions regarding potential reparative actions that could be taken within the governance structures of Oregon.
Recognizes the framers of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974 and the occasion of the fortieth anniversary of ratification and commends the delegates to the Constitutional Convention of 1973 for their service to the state.
Recognizing that the United States has a moral and legal obligation to provide reparations for the enslavement of Africans and its lasting harm on the lives of millions of Black people in the United States.
Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.
Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.