Michigan House Bill HB5945

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/3/24
• Refer: 9/24/24
• Report Pass: 12/3/24
• Engrossed: 12/11/24
• Refer: 12/18/24

Caption

Transportation: funds; local agency infrastructure disaster relief fund and board; create. Amends secs. 10 & 11 of 1951 PA 51 (MCL 247.660 & 247.661) & adds sec. 11k.

Impact

The passage of HB5945 is poised to enhance state support for local infrastructure, particularly in the wake of disasters. It mandates a structured approach to funding applications for relief, allowing local road agencies to secure necessary financial resources to rehabilitate affected infrastructure. This initiative may reduce the financial strain on local governments and improve response times in addressing infrastructure damage, which is crucial for public safety and community resilience following emergencies.

Summary

House Bill 5945 seeks to amend the Michigan Public Act 51 of 1951 by establishing a Local Agency Infrastructure Disaster Relief Fund and Board. This legislation aims to provide financial assistance to local road agencies affected by state-level declared emergencies. The focus is on restoring or replacing critical infrastructure such as roads and bridges that may have deteriorated due to disasters. The bill effectively reinforces state efforts to support local governments during infrastructural crises, thereby addressing challenges faced by local agencies in maintaining essential services following unexpected events.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HB5945 is largely positive among legislators and local government stakeholders. Supporters appreciate the concerted effort to address infrastructure challenges directly related to emergency situations and view the creation of a specialized fund as a significant step towards ensuring better preparedness and support for local agencies. However, some concerns may exist regarding the allocation and management of funds, as the framework for oversight will be essential to ensure that money is utilized effectively.

Contention

While there is widespread support for the practical implications of HB5945, some potential contention could arise over the specifics of the funding distribution process and the qualifications for local agencies to access these funds. Critics may argue about the need for transparency and accountability in how funds are allocated, as well as any stipulations that might unfairly disadvantage smaller or less financially stable local agencies in their relief efforts.