Michigan Senate Bill SB1052

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 10/30/24
• Refer: 10/30/24
• Report Pass: 12/11/24
• Refer: 12/11/24
• Report Pass: 12/12/24
• Engrossed: 12/12/24
• Refer: 12/12/24

Caption

Environmental protection: hazardous waste; disposal facilities; impose moratorium on, limit capacity and geographic concentration of, and prohibit acceptance of TENORM by. Amends secs. 11102, 11110, 11125, 11132, 11514b, 62501 & 62502 of 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.11102 et seq.); adds secs. 11122, 62508b & 62509d & repeals secs. 11111 & 11112 of 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.11111 & 324.11112).

Impact

The implications of SB1052 are far-reaching, as it aims to strengthen protections against potential hazards associated with hazardous waste disposal. The bill seeks to curb the risks that arise from the over-concentration of waste management facilities in low-income or severely impacted areas. By enforcing stricter requirements for new licenses and expansions, the legislation intends to ensure that waste management practices do not compromise the safety of Michigan's groundwater and the overall welfare of local communities.

Summary

Senate Bill 1052 amends the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act in Michigan, focusing on the management and disposal of hazardous waste, particularly Technologically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material (TENORM). The bill introduces measures such as a moratorium on new hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facilities for up to five years, while existing facility expansions are limited to prevent overconcentration of waste management sites, especially in vulnerable communities. It specifies rigorous financial responsibility requirements for operators of wells, including substantial insurance coverage to protect public health and the environment.

Sentiment

Sentiment around SB1052 seems to reflect a balance between public health concerns and economic realities. Support for the bill predominantly comes from environmental groups and local advocacy organizations that view the measures as essential for safeguarding communities against harmful pollution sources. However, there is also apprehension among certain industry stakeholders about the potential impact on waste management operations, emphasizing a divide in opinion regarding the feasibility and effectiveness of the stringent new regulations.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns from business entities about the potential for increased regulatory burden, which could lead to challenges in maintaining existing operations or expanding services. Advocates fear that failure to properly manage hazardous waste poses unacceptable risks, while opponents argue that overregulation may stifle economic opportunities. The debate highlights the ongoing tension between environmental protection initiatives and industry growth, as stakeholders push for solutions that adequately address both imperatives.