New Jersey Assembly Bill A1695

New Jersey 2022-2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/11/22
• Refer: 1/11/22
• Report Pass: 5/19/22
• Engrossed: 6/16/22
• Enrolled: 6/29/22
• Chaptered: 7/29/22
• Passed: 7/29/22

Caption

Requires Secretary of Higher Education and DOLWD to establish performance quality standards for career-oriented programs of study offered by institutions of higher education, degree-granting proprietary institutions, and private career schools.

Impact

The implementation of A1695 is expected to significantly affect the standards governing private career education in New Jersey. By mandating performance evaluations, the bill seeks to prevent institutions from offering subpar education or training programs that do not lead to successful job placements. If a program fails to meet established standards, the Secretary has the authority to suspend or terminate said programs and may revoke the institution’s ability to confer degrees. This action seeks to enhance accountability in the education sector and protect students from institutions that do not deliver satisfactory educational results.

Summary

Bill A1695 introduces regulations requiring the Secretary of Higher Education and the Commissioner of Labor and Workforce Development to establish performance quality standards for career-oriented programs at institutions of higher education, including private career schools. The bill aims to ensure that these programs not only prepare students effectively for employment in specific occupations but also maintain a level of quality that justifies the tuition they charge. The proposal emphasizes the importance of linking educational outcomes with labor market needs, establishing a framework for assessment that considers average earnings of workers in specific fields.

Sentiment

The sentiment around A1695 appears to be cautiously positive among proponents who believe that higher standards in career education will improve job readiness for graduates and fairer tuition costs. However, concerns arise regarding the feasibility of implementing such performance standards and the potential negative impact on career schools that may struggle to comply. Opponents may argue that the bill could disproportionately affect smaller institutions or lead to increased tuition costs as schools adapt to new regulatory requirements. The discourse illustrates the tension between ensuring quality education and maintaining accessibility for diverse student populations.

Contention

Some notable points of contention include the balance of regulatory oversight versus institutional autonomy. Critics of A1695 could argue that strict performance standards might stifle innovation and flexibility within vocational training programs. Additionally, there are worries that the administrative burden placed on schools to comply with new reporting requirements could detract from their educational mission. The measure's ability to effectively respond to the evolving needs of the labor market while fostering a diverse range of educational opportunities remains a significant debate point.