Michigan House Bill HB6282

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/10/24
• Refer: 12/10/24

Caption

Animals: animal shelters; cross-references to 1969 PA 287 in Michigan penal code; update. Amends sec. 49 of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.49).

Impact

If enacted, HB6282 would significantly tighten regulations surrounding animal fighting in Michigan, aligning with public sentiment favoring the protection of animals. The legislation outlines severe penalties for offenders, thereby enhancing law enforcement's ability to address animal exploitation effectively. Additionally, it would enable authorities to confiscate involved animals, with provisions for humane treatment, including euthanasia where warranted, to safeguard public safety and animal welfare. This means local animal control agencies would have greater authority and responsibility in handling cases of animal cruelty and exploitation.

Summary

House Bill 6282 seeks to amend section 49 of the Michigan penal code (1931 PA 328) concerning the treatment of animals involved in fighting, baiting, or shooting scenarios. The proposed changes aim to clarify definitions related to animal control agencies and enhance the penalties for individuals found engaging in activities harmful to animals. The bill specifically prohibits the ownership, possession, and use of animals for fighting or baiting purposes, and also addresses related offenses, including the organization and promotion of such activities. Violators could face substantial fines and potential imprisonment, alongside mandatory community service requirements.

Contention

There may be points of contention regarding the bill's potential impact on local regulations related to animal control and the concerns from individuals and groups who see this as an overreach of state law. Some stakeholders might argue that the bill does not adequately address the resources necessary for animal control agencies to enforce these provisions effectively. Furthermore, balancing the interests of animal welfare against rights of individuals involved in animal-related activities will likely prove to be a contentious debate among lawmakers and community advocacy groups.