Michigan Senate Bill SB1171

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/3/24
• Refer: 12/3/24
• Report Pass: 12/12/24
• Refer: 12/12/24
• Engrossed: 12/13/24
• Refer: 12/13/24

Caption

Energy: gas and oil; certain standards under the motor fuels quality act; update. Amends secs. 2, 3, 4, 4a, 5, 6, 7, 10a & 10d of 1984 PA 44 (MCL 290.642 et seq.); adds secs. 4b, 7a & 7b & repeals sec. 5a of 1984 PA 44 (MCL 290.645a).

Impact

The legislation is designed to bolster environmental protection measures by mandating lower vapor pressure in fuel to reduce air pollution, particularly in sensitive areas. It also provides guidelines on the regular inspection and testing of motor fuels, which would not only help maintain fuel quality but also protect public health by detecting unsafe levels of contaminants such as water and sediments. By enforcing stricter compliance measures, the bill aims to regulate the quality of fuels and subsequently enhance overall consumer trust in the quality and safety of motor fuel products in Michigan.

Summary

Senate Bill 1171 proposes amendments to the Motor Fuels Quality Act, originally enacted in 1984, to update various standards regarding gasoline and other motor fuels. The bill introduces new requirements for the fuel quality ensuring that fuels dispensed within Michigan adhere to specified federal and state standards. This encompasses stipulations regarding the additives permitted in gasoline, the vapor pressure limits, and mandates for enhanced testing procedures to be conducted on motor fuels to ensure compliance with these standards.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 1171 is predominantly supportive among environmental advocates and health professionals, who see the bill as a significant step towards better air quality and public health safety. However, some fuel distributors and industry representatives have raised concerns about potential impacts on operational costs and the feasibility of adhering to the new stringent requirements. There is an anticipation of increased scrutiny on compliance, which they argue could financially burden smaller distributors while possibly leading to supply chain disruptions.

Contention

A notable point of contention within the discussions surrounding SB 1171 is the potential burden placed on smaller fuel retailers in complying with the new standards. Critics argue that while the intent of the bill—enhancing fuel quality and environmental compliance—is valid, the financial implications and administrative complexities for smaller retailers could be detrimental. The enforcement of enhanced testing and compliance measures raises questions about the capacity of state agencies to ensure consistent oversight across diverse fuel businesses. Supporters stress that improved fuel quality standards could prevent adverse health effects and environmental damage, rationalizing the costs associated with implementation.