Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB12

Filed
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to alternative fuel fleets of certain governmental entities, including funding for motor vehicles, infrastructure, and equipment.

Impact

The implementation of SB12 is expected to have significant implications for state laws concerning vehicle emissions and environmental regulation. By prioritizing alternative fuel usage, the bill aims to reduce reliance on traditional fossil fuels and potentially decrease greenhouse gas emissions produced by government-operated fleets. Additionally, the introduction of a governmental alternative fuel fleet grant program is part of the bill, helping agencies afford the conversion costs associated with switching to alternative fuel vehicles and necessary infrastructure. This could catalyze a shift in how public transportation is managed and funded in Texas.

Summary

SB12 is legislation aimed at promoting the use of alternative fuels within the vehicle fleets of specified governmental entities in Texas. The bill mandates that state agencies operating fleets of more than 15 vehicles convert those fleets to utilize alternative fuels such as compressed natural gas, liquefied natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, hydrogen, and electricity, particularly for new vehicle acquisitions. While state agencies are required to adhere to this conversion, counties and municipalities are authorized to do so but are not mandated. This initiative reflects a broader push towards sustainable energy practices and emissions reduction within public transportation and state-funded vehicle usage.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB12 appears to be largely positive among proponents who view the bill as a crucial step towards environmental sustainability and cleaner air initiatives. Advocates argue that transitioning to alternative fuels will not only benefit the environment but also set a precedent for future energy policies. However, there may also be some contention regarding the funding and feasibility of such conversions, especially concerning the economic burden on local governments or smaller municipalities that may struggle to meet the requirements without adequate state support.

Contention

Key points of contention arise over the allocation of funds for the proposed grants and whether the requirement for state fleets could lead to budgetary constraints for local entities. While the bill outlines funding from the Texas emissions reduction plan, the challenge remains in ensuring that the funds are sufficient and accessible. Critics may argue that if not properly managed, this initiative could inadvertently stifle smaller municipalities from making the necessary transitions, thereby widening the disparity in environmental efforts between larger and smaller governmental units.

Companion Bills

TX HB3518

Identical Relating to alternative fuel fleets of certain governmental entities, including funding for motor vehicles, infrastructure, and equipment.

Similar Bills

TX HB3518

Relating to alternative fuel fleets of certain governmental entities, including funding for motor vehicles, infrastructure, and equipment.

TX SB26

Relating to the Texas emissions reduction plan and other related programs and measures to reduce emissions.

TX HB1979

Relating to the Texas emissions reduction plan and other related programs and measures to reduce emissions.

TX HB432

Relating to the acquisition by state agencies of low-emissions vehicles and vehicles using alternative fuels.

TX HB3835

Relating to the use of certain alternative fuels by state agency motor vehicles.

CA AB2663

Use fuel tax: dimethyl ether: fuel blend.

WV SB446

Removing methanol and methanol fuel from definition of special fuel

WV HB3238

Removing methanol and methanol fuel from the definition of special fuel