A RESOLUTION urging the United States Congress to designate Big Bone Lick State Historic Site as a national historical park and the Kentucky Tourism, Arts and Heritage Cabinet to work in conjunction with the United States Congress and the United States Department of the Interior to facilitate in this endeavor.
If passed, HR152 would propel Big Bone Lick to a national level of recognition, potentially unlocking federal funds for preservation and development that might not be available under its current designation. This change is expected to not only protect the site's natural and historical resources but also to attract more visitors, which could stimulate economic growth in the surrounding areas through increased tourism activities. The collaboration between the Kentucky Tourism, Arts and Heritage Cabinet and federal authorities would be essential in facilitating this transition to national park status.
House Resolution 152 (HR152) is a legislative resolution aimed at urging the United States Congress to designate Big Bone Lick State Historic Site in Kentucky as a national historical park. The resolution highlights the site's rich historical landscape, which includes geological features, remnants of prehistoric animals, and milestones in American paleontology, notably tied to the expeditions of Lewis and Clark. Proponents argue that achieving national park status would enhance the site's visibility, funding, and preservation efforts, ultimately supporting local tourism and educational initiatives.
The sentiment surrounding HR152 appears to be optimistic, with supporters expressing strong enthusiasm for the advocacy of historical preservation and economic development. The resolution's proponents view the designation as a means to further cement Kentucky’s identity in the realm of historical and natural significance. However, there may be voices of caution regarding the implications of federal oversight on state-managed sites, though these concerns are less prominently noted in the discussions surrounding the resolution.
While the resolution seems to garner support, discussions may arise about balancing local interests in the management of Big Bone Lick with federal involvement. Local stakeholders might express concerns over the potential for increased tourism leading to environmental impacts, or themes of commercialization countering education-based initiatives. Nonetheless, the overarching aim of the bill—a call for recognition and preservation of Kentucky's historical site—remains a focal point of the legislative conversation.