Maryland 2023 Regular Session

Maryland Senate Bill SB924

Introduced
2/16/23  

Caption

Workgroup to Study the Impact of Court-Mandated Fines and Fees

Impact

The Workgroup will explore data concerning the imposition and collection of various court-related fees across different jurisdictions. This research will involve collecting historical data from fiscal years 2017 to 2022, focusing on the types and amounts collected related to misdemeanors, felonies, and traffic violations. The findings of the Workgroup are expected to inform future legislative changes aimed at reducing or eliminating specific fines and fees that disproportionately affect low-income residents.

Summary

Senate Bill 924 aims to address the implications of court-mandated fines and fees on low-income residents in Maryland. The legislation establishes a Workgroup tasked with studying how these fines and fees impact individuals and the broader revenue structure that relies on them. The bill reflects a growing recognition of the financial burden that court-mandated fees can impose, especially on those with limited financial resources, and seeks to develop legislative recommendations for mitigating such impacts.

Contention

A central point of contention regarding SB924 is whether the existing system of court fines and fees is an effective means of generating revenue. Proponents argue that restructuring these fees could lead to more equitable outcomes for low-income individuals, while critics may express concern about the potential impact on the state's overall revenue collection capabilities. The resulting recommendations from the Workgroup by December 31, 2023, may lead to significant changes in how fines and fees are structured in Maryland.

Notable_points

With a clear mandate, the Workgroup will consist of various stakeholders including state legislators, public defenders, and representatives from consumer rights organizations. Importantly, this collaboration aims to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the challenges posed by court-imposed financial obligations. The timeframe in which the Workgroup must report is relatively short, raising questions about the depth of analysis that can be accomplished before the General Assembly's deadline.

Companion Bills

MD HB154

Crossfiled Workgroup to Study the Impact of Court-Mandated Fines and Fees

Previously Filed As

MD HB154

Workgroup to Study the Impact of Court-Mandated Fines and Fees

MD HB1199

Workgroup to Study the Impact of Court-Mandated Fines and Fees

MD SB873

Workgroup to Study Adoption of a Statute for Assault in the Third Degree

MD SB457

Workgroup to Study Trial in Absence

MD SB764

Childhood Exposure to Violence – Health and Social Impacts – Public Awareness Campaign Workgroup

MD HB1377

Childhood Exposure to Violence - Health and Social Impacts - Public Awareness Campaign Workgroup

MD HB1373

Calvert County Public Schools - Extracurricular Activities for Homeschooled Students - Pilot Program and Workgroup

MD HB166

Workgroup to Study Community Association Standing in Nuisance Actions in Baltimore County

MD HB1066

Commission on Behavioral Health Care Treatment and Access - Workgroups

MD SB827

Courts and Judicial Proceedings - Jury Examination and Workgroup to Study the Voir Dire Process

Similar Bills

CA SB33

Electronic benefits transfer system.

CA AB972

Local Assistance and Grant Program Streamlining Workgroup.

CA AB1273

Classified employees: Classified Employee Staffing Ratio Workgroup.

CA AB715

Workgroup review of opioid pain reliever use and abuse.

CA SB1409

Pupil instruction: nonclassroom-based instruction and independent study: workgroup.

CA AB890

Nonminor dependents: county of residence.

CA AB2971

Classified Employee Staffing Ratio Workgroup: community college districts.

CA AB6

Attorney General: duties.