Modifies provisions relating to landlord-tenant actions, including eviction proceeding moratoriums and filings for transfers of real property with outstanding collectible judgments
The bill will amend Chapters 67 and 534 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri by adding new sections that govern landlord-tenant proceedings. The first significant change is the prohibition of eviction moratoriums at the local level unless sanctioned by the state, which could prevent local authorities from acting independently during crises that could necessitate such actions, like economic downturns. The second notable amendment requires all transfers of title for rental properties with outstanding collectible judgments to be filed in circuit court within thirty days, enhancing transparency regarding debts attached to real estate transactions.
Senate Bill 895 aims to modify statutory provisions related to landlord-tenant interactions, particularly concerning eviction proceedings and the filing of property transfers. Specifically, it restricts counties and municipalities from imposing moratoriums on eviction proceedings unless expressly authorized by state law. This provision is intended to ensure that local governments cannot unilaterally halt evictions, thereby promoting a level of consistency in landlord-tenant law across the state.
Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 895 appears to be mixed. Proponents argue that the bill supports landlords' rights and the integrity of the rental market by preventing local governments from implementing potentially arbitrary moratoriums. Additionally, they believe that mandating the filing of property transfers ensures responsible practices regarding outstanding judgments. Conversely, detractors might view the bill as undermining necessary local responsive measures during times of hardship, putting renters at increased risk of eviction without the ability to enforce protections at the local level.
A key point of contention lies in the balance between state authority and local control. Advocates of the bill contend that a uniform approach to eviction proceedings helps maintain order within the real estate market. In contrast, opponents express concerns about the effect of removing local discretion, especially in instances where communities might face unique challenges that warrant temporary protections against eviction. Furthermore, the requirement for timely court filings connected to property transfers may pose operational challenges for landlords and complicate existing practices, highlighting tensions between regulatory compliance and practical business management.