West Virginia House Bill HB2766

West Virginia 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/18/23
• Refer: 1/18/23

Caption

To clarify when inmates may receive “good time” or time served

Impact

The passage of HB 2766 would have a significant impact on state laws governing corrections management and the treatment of inmates. Specifically, it would alter the existing framework on good time credits, which aim to incentivize good behavior among inmates. By disallowing good time for serious felonies, the bill seeks to ensure that those guilty of severe offenses face stricter parole provisions, potentially contributing to public safety and accountability. However, it also raises concerns about fairness and rehabilitation opportunities for non-violent offenders who may be grouped with more serious crimes under this statute.

Summary

House Bill 2766 seeks to amend the West Virginia Code concerning the eligibility of inmates to earn 'good time' credit towards their sentence for good behavior. The bill establishes strict regulations under which certain offenders—including those sentenced for life, crimes against persons, sexual offenses, child abuse, and human trafficking—are explicitly ineligible for earning good time. As a result, this legislation aims to impose stricter post-release requirements for such individuals, mandating a minimum of one year of post-release supervision accompanied by electronic monitoring after their discharge date.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2766 appears to be polarized. Proponents argue that the bill strengthens public safety and accountability for serious offenders, making it a necessary measure to protect communities from repeat offenders. Opponents, however, raise ethical concerns about the bill's potential to undermine rehabilitation and the idea of second chances for inmates, arguing it could lead to longer sentences without due consideration for reform-induced behavioral changes.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the bill's implications for overcrowding in prisons and the effectiveness of electronic monitoring systems. Critics express worry that restricting good time could lead to longer incarceration periods without a corresponding increase in public safety. Additionally, there are debates regarding the allocation of resources towards post-release monitoring and the effectiveness of such measures in preventing recidivism. The bill illustrates a broader struggle within criminal justice policy that balances public safety concerns with the need for humane treatment and rehabilitation of inmates.