Maryland 2024 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB344

Introduced
1/17/24  
Refer
1/17/24  
Report Pass
4/3/24  
Engrossed
4/3/24  
Refer
4/3/24  

Caption

Transportation - Vision Zero - Implementation

Impact

If enacted, HB344 would formalize the Vision Zero initiative into state law, mandating the establishment of a commission tasked with advising on traffic safety policies, programs, and the prioritization of resources to enhance roadway safety. The bill designates a coordinator responsible for managing the implementation of Vision Zero, specifically focusing on infrastructure improvements, public safety strategies, and enhancing community engagement related to traffic safety. Additionally, public meetings will be held quarterly, ensuring transparency and public involvement in discussions surrounding roadway safety measures.

Summary

House Bill 344 establishes the Vision Zero Advisory Commission under the Maryland Department of Transportation, aimed at eliminating fatalities and serious injuries on roadways. The bill outlines the goals of the Vision Zero program, including making roads safer for all users, including drivers, pedestrians, and cyclists. It emphasizes a comprehensive approach that incorporates collaboration with local authorities, law enforcement, and community members to identify safety strategies and implement effective program measures. By creating a dedicated commission, HB344 seeks to prioritize and streamline roadway safety initiatives across Maryland.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB344 appears to be positive, particularly among advocates of roadway safety and public health. Proponents view the establishment of the Vision Zero program as a necessary and proactive step towards reducing traffic-related injuries and fatalities. However, there may be some concerns regarding funding and the potential bureaucratic implications of creating another government body. Despite this, the emphasis on collaboration and data-driven strategies has garnered support from various stakeholders, including advocacy groups for pedestrians and cyclists.

Contention

While the bill is largely supported, some points of contention may arise regarding the specific strategies adopted by the commission and how they may impact existing policies or local governance. Stakeholder groups could have differing opinions on the best practices for implementing Vision Zero statewide, including the balance between state directives and local needs. Thus, ensuring effective communication and cooperation among all involved parties will be essential to address potential conflicts and make the Vision Zero program successful.

Companion Bills

MD SB345

Crossfiled Transportation - Vision Zero - Implementation

Similar Bills

MD SB345

Transportation - Vision Zero - Implementation

MD HB778

Transportation - Investment Program - MARC Rail Service (Maryland Regional Rail Transformation Act)

MD SB514

Transportation - Investment Program - MARC Rail Service (Maryland Regional Rail Transformation Act)

MD HB813

Montgomery County – Speed and School Bus Monitoring Systems MC 03–22

MD SB19

Equity in Transportation Sector - Guidelines and Analyses

MD HB9

Equity in Transportation Sector - Guidelines and Analyses

MD SB362

Budget Reconciliation and Financing Act of 2024

MD HB1369

Montgomery County - Speed Monitoring Systems - Maryland Route 200 (Intercounty Connector) MC 11-24