Tennessee House Bill HB1692

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/8/24
• Refer: 1/10/24
• Refer: 2/13/24
• Refer: 2/21/24
• Engrossed: 2/29/24
• Enrolled: 4/3/24
• Passed: 4/22/24
• Chaptered: 5/1/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4, Chapter 3, Part 22 and Title 10, Chapter 7, relative to records.

Impact

By implementing these changes, HB1692 influences state laws related to public records by ensuring that binding contracts and agreements made by the Department of Tourist Development become public records upon signing. Such measures are expected to foster accountability and allow for better public oversight of governmental dealings, especially in sectors that are financed by taxpayer money. The law also mandates that confidential documents be retained for a specified period, safeguarding records that could be sensitive but still necessitate retention for transparency.

Summary

House Bill 1692 aims to amend Tennessee's existing laws regarding public records, particularly focusing on how the Department of Tourist Development manages its records and contracts. The bill establishes a clear principle of open records, indicating that all information and documents produced or received by the department must generally be open for public inspection. This legislation is positioned to enhance transparency in state operations, particularly in areas where public funds are involved.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB1692 is primarily positive among proponents who value transparency in government dealings. Advocates argue that the bill represents a significant step forward in promoting open governance and public accountability. However, there may be hesitance from certain stakeholders, particularly those concerned about the protection of proprietary and sensitive information. The discussion has led to an acknowledgment of the balance required between transparency and confidentiality, indicating nuanced sentiments among various interest groups.

Contention

Notable points of contention in the discussions around HB1692 revolve around the definition and protection of proprietary information. Critics express concern that the broad application of the open records principle might inadvertently jeopardize sensitive data necessary for the state's commercial competitiveness, such as trade secrets and specific marketing strategies. This tension highlights a critical debate on how to safeguard vital economic information while ensuring that government operations remain open and accessible to public scrutiny.