Tennessee Senate Bill SB2093

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/29/24
• Chaptered: 5/1/24
• Passed: 5/1/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4, Chapter 3, Part 22 and Title 10, Chapter 7, relative to records.

Impact

If enacted, SB 2093 would modernize Tennessee's approach to public record retention and disclosure, aligning it more closely with the principles of transparency and accountability that are increasingly demanded by citizens. It defines specific periods during which sensitive information can remain confidential but establishes clear timelines for public access. The bill also entails rigorous requirements for the retention of confidential records, ensuring that they are not destroyed prematurely, thus safeguarding public interests and promoting governmental responsibility.

Summary

Senate Bill 2093 aims to amend the Tennessee Code regarding the handling and accessibility of records maintained by the Department of Tourist Development. The bill establishes a principle of open records, mandating that documents and information related to public contracts are generally available for public inspection. This legislation represents a significant step toward improving transparency within the state's tourism sector, enabling citizens and stakeholders easier access to essential operational information and fostering a more accountable government framework.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 2093 is largely positive, particularly among advocates for government transparency and public access to information. Supporters argue that the bill will enhance accountability in government dealings and ensure that taxpayer-funded projects and agreements are subject to public scrutiny. However, there are concerns about overly broad definitions of confidentiality that could potentially hinder transparency if not properly regulated. These nuanced discussions underscore a broader societal push for reform in governmental practices regarding data privacy and public trust.

Contention

Notably, there is contention regarding the balance between transparency and the protection of sensitive information. Critics of the bill fear that while it promotes public access, there may be instances where the definitions of sensitive information could be manipulated to withhold data under the guise of confidentiality. The legislation does exempt certain categories of information, including trade secrets and proprietary data, which may lead to debates about where to draw the line between public interest and private protection. As the bill progresses, the discourse surrounding these issues will likely shape any amendments or adjustments required to ensure its effectiveness.