Tennessee Senate Bill SB1644

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/5/24
• Engrossed: 2/12/24
• Enrolled: 4/19/24
• Passed: 5/1/24
• Chaptered: 5/9/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4, Chapter 29 and Section 4-3-2711, relative to the Tennessee council on autism spectrum disorder.

Impact

The bill's passage is expected to have a positive impact on the functioning of the Tennessee Council on Autism Spectrum Disorder. By enabling members to be reimbursed for travel, it may promote a more diverse representation on the council, as it alleviates financial burdens on members who may otherwise be unable to participate. The overall enhancement in participation is anticipated to benefit the council's efforts in addressing issues related to autism spectrum disorder and creating effective policy recommendations.

Summary

Senate Bill 1644 aims to amend provisions related to the Tennessee Council on Autism Spectrum Disorder, specifically addressing the compensation and reimbursement policies for its members. The key change includes allowing council members to receive reimbursement for travel expenses incurred during meetings. This alteration is seen as a way to encourage member participation and ensures that members are compensated for their time and travel, which could lead to a more active and engaged council.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding SB 1644 appears to be supportive, with the bill seen as a necessary update to the existing regulations governing the council. Advocates argue that the changes will empower the council, fostering a more inclusive environment for discussions that are crucial to improving services for individuals with autism. The adoption of this bill indicates recognition of the importance of the council’s work and the need for practical measures to support its members.

Contention

While there may not be significant contention noted in the available discussions around SB 1644, some might argue about the allocation of state funds for reimbursement and whether these expenses could divert resources from direct support services for individuals with autism. However, overall, the proposal has been presented as a step toward enhancing council effectiveness without major opposition, illustrating a broad consensus around the need for change in support of autism advocacy.