Tennessee House Bill HB2365

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/24
• Refer: 2/1/24
• Refer: 2/20/24
• Refer: 2/28/24
• Refer: 4/17/24
• Chaptered: 5/9/24
• Passed: 5/9/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4, Chapter 29 and Section 4-3-2711, relative to the Tennessee council on autism spectrum disorder.

Impact

The legislative action to amend the existing statute has implications for how individuals involved with the council on autism spectrum disorder are compensated for their service. By clarifying the reimbursement process, the bill aims to facilitate the council's operations without creating financial burdens on the members. Furthermore, the stipulated travel reimbursements are expected to ensure that individuals from various districts can participate in council activities without concern for personal costs, which is crucial for maintaining a diverse representation on the council.

Summary

House Bill 2365, which aims to amend Tennessee Code Annotated concerning the Tennessee council on autism spectrum disorder, modifies the provisions related to member compensation for attending council meetings. Specifically, it states that council members will serve without compensation but may be eligible for reimbursement of specific travel expenses. These reimbursements must comply with travel regulations set by the relevant department and require prior approval from the attorney general. This amendment seeks to formalize the compensation structure for council members while ensuring accountability in expense management.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2365 appeared to be largely positive, reflecting a consensus on the necessity of supporting council members who contribute their time to assist individuals affected by autism spectrum disorder. The adjustments to the compensation structure were deemed reasonable, particularly from stakeholders advocating for disability services. However, there were mentions of concerns regarding budget constraints and the need for careful management of state funds, suggesting a cautious optimism about the bill's passage.

Contention

While the bill primarily seeks to streamline the reimbursement process for council members, potential sources of contention could arise from discussions on how reimbursement regulations are applied. Financial oversight and the interpretation of what constitutes reimbursable travel expenses might lead to differing opinions on the appropriateness of certain expenses. Additionally, ensuring that the council remains transparent about its spending and scope of work is essential to prevent misuse of state funds.