Tennessee Senate Bill SB1654

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/8/24
• Failed: 2/27/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 39, Chapter 17, Part 13, relative to firearms.

Impact

If enacted, SB1654 would significantly affect the legality of firearm transactions in Tennessee, targeting individuals who knowingly facilitate the transfer of firearms to those barred by law. This addresses concerns regarding gun violence and the illegal distribution of firearms, aligning with broader national efforts to strengthen gun control measures and enhance public safety. The law would be applicable to all transfers occurring on or after July 1, 2024, indicating that compliance will be mandatory from that date onwards.

Summary

Senate Bill 1654 aims to amend the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically Title 39, Chapter 17, Part 13, by introducing regulations concerning the transfer of firearms. It establishes that it is an offense to transfer a firearm to an individual who is known or should be known to be prohibited from purchasing or possessing firearms under state or federal law. Such a violation is classified as a Class A misdemeanor, highlighting the seriousness with which the bill treats the issue of illegal firearm transfers.

Sentiment

The reception of SB1654 is polarized. Proponents argue that the legislation is a necessary step toward preventing firearms from falling into the hands of individuals who are legally prohibited from possessing them, thereby enhancing community safety. On the contrary, opponents of the bill may view it as an impingement on personal freedoms or an unnecessary expansion of government regulation concerning gun ownership and transfers.

Contention

While the bill's primary focus appears to be public safety through stricter controls on firearm transfers, it raises concerns about how such regulations will be enforced and who will bear the brunt of legal repercussions for violations. This introduces a discussion about the balance between the right to bear arms and ensuring responsible ownership and transfer practices. The legislative history shows that it has faced challenges, evidenced by its failure in the Senate Judiciary Committee, where it received 2 votes in favor and 6 against, indicating notable discontent among legislators.