Tennessee Senate Bill SB1666

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/8/24
• Engrossed: 2/15/24
• Enrolled: 3/5/24
• Passed: 3/15/24
• Chaptered: 3/26/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4, Chapter 41 and Title 62, Chapter 6, Part 1, relative to the Go Build Tennessee Act.

Impact

If enacted, SB1666 will impact the relevant statutes concerning infrastructure development and funding in the state. The specified repeal date indicates an effort to reassess and potentially innovate the existing frameworks guiding state-funded construction projects. Legislative discussions suggest that updating these provisions could foster a more proactive development strategy aimed at addressing the state's growing infrastructure needs. This modernization of the law may yield efficiencies in project execution and funding allocation.

Summary

Senate Bill 1666 seeks to amend the Tennessee Code Annotated regarding the Go Build Tennessee Act, setting a repealing date for specific provisions by July 1, 2029. The bill has been introduced to streamline processes related to state infrastructure projects and potentially allocate funds more efficiently for construction across Tennessee. Proponents of the bill argue that it will facilitate the advancement of critical infrastructure developments, which are aligned with the state's long-term economic growth goals.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding SB1666 appears to be cautiously optimistic among legislators and stakeholders involved in the infrastructure sector. Supporters emphasize the necessity for updated regulations to keep pace with economic demands and enhance the state's competitive edge. Dissenting voices, however, express concerns regarding the implications of repealing established provisions and the effects this might have on project oversight and quality control in state-funded initiatives.

Contention

Notable contentions arise from differing views on how best to manage state infrastructure projects. While proponents see the repeal of outdated regulations as a step toward fostering more streamlined processes, critics warn that eliminating certain provisions could undermine the quality assurance and oversight currently ensured under existing laws. This debate encapsulates broader themes of efficiency versus regulatory integrity, which are pivotal in discussions about public infrastructure development.