Tennessee House Bill HB1702

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/8/24
• Refer: 1/10/24
• Refer: 2/6/24
• Refer: 2/13/24
• Refer: 2/21/24
• Refer: 2/27/24
• Chaptered: 3/26/24
• Passed: 3/26/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4, Chapter 41 and Title 62, Chapter 6, Part 1, relative to the Go Build Tennessee Act.

Impact

The proposed changes in HB 1702 are significant for both state agencies and private contractors involved in construction projects. By updating the regulatory framework, the bill is designed to reduce bureaucratic hurdles that can slow down project initiation and completion. This change is expected to promote economic growth by encouraging infrastructure development and improving state resources, which supporters argue is critical in attracting new businesses and investments to Tennessee.

Summary

House Bill 1702 aims to amend certain provisions of the Tennessee Code Annotated related to the Go Build Tennessee Act. The primary focus of the bill is on enhancing the processes and regulations governing construction and infrastructure projects within the state. By streamlining certain procedures and regulations, the bill seeks to facilitate better and more efficient project implementation, thereby supporting the state's overall development goals.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1702 appears to be largely positive among proponents, particularly those in the construction industry and economic development sectors. Advocates emphasize the need for modernization and efficiency in state construction laws to keep pace with growing demands. However, there are concerns from some advocacy groups who feel that changes could potentially sidestep necessary oversight or diminish certain standards associated with construction and public safety.

Contention

Notably, one point of contention has been the fear that reducing regulations may lead to compromised safety standards or lower-quality infrastructure projects. Critics argue that while efficiency is important, it should not come at the expense of strict oversight that ensures public safety. The discussions around HB 1702 reflect a broader debate about the balance between regulation and efficiency in state governance regarding construction and infrastructure development.