Maryland 2024 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB776

Introduced
1/31/24  
Refer
1/31/24  
Report Pass
2/27/24  
Engrossed
3/1/24  
Refer
3/4/24  
Report Pass
3/28/24  
Enrolled
4/4/24  
Chaptered
5/9/24  

Caption

Maryland Technology Development Corporation - Authority

Impact

If enacted, HB 776 would amend existing laws under the Economic Development Articles, empowering the MTDC to act in a way similar to private corporations. This change will allow the MTDC to establish written agreements, thereby providing it a legal framework to secure compensation for administrative support and various services. The impact of this bill is expected to streamline operations within the corporation, potentially leading to increased collaborations with both public and private entities, ultimately benefiting the state's economy and supporting technology-driven projects.

Summary

House Bill 776 focuses on the Maryland Technology Development Corporation (MTDC) and its authority to provide administrative services or support to certain entities. The bill aims to formalize and expand the functions of the MTDC, allowing it to generate revenue by receiving compensation for the services it renders. This legislative change is intended to enhance the operational capabilities of the corporation while promoting broader economic development initiatives within the state of Maryland. By enabling the MTDC to engage in such transactions, the bill seeks to foster innovation and support businesses through administrative support and resources.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 776 appears to be predominantly positive as it aligns with pro-business objectives and aims to enhance the effectiveness of the Maryland Technology Development Corporation. There is an acknowledgment of the importance of providing support to businesses, especially those involved in technology and innovation. Stakeholders generally view the bill as a step forward in improving the economic landscape of Maryland, thereby boosting job creation and investment opportunities.

Contention

While there may not be significant opposition noted in the discussions or voting records, the bill does present potential contentions regarding the operations and oversight of the MTDC. As it expands its authority and ability to generate revenue, there may be calls for transparency and accountability in how the corporation conducts its operations. Critics might argue for careful examination of the implications of allowing a state authority to function similarly to a private entity, particularly concerning the management of public funds and resources.

Companion Bills

MD SB634

Crossfiled Maryland Technology Development Corporation - Authority

Previously Filed As

MD SB699

Maryland Technology Development Corporation - Equitech Growth Fund and Commission

MD HB781

Maryland Technology Development Corporation - Equitech Growth Fund and Commission

MD SB720

Horse Racing - Extension of Maryland Horse Racing Act and Establishment of Maryland Thoroughbred Racetrack Operating Authority

MD SB804

Maryland Technology Development Corporation - Community Technology Program for Maryland - Establishment

MD HB161

Northeast Maryland Waste Disposal Authority - Evaluation, Termination of Bond Authority, and Assumption of Functions, Employees, and Contracts (Northeast Maryland Waste Disposal Authority Sunset Act)

MD SB125

Maryland Technology Development Corporation - Business Diversity Incubator Program and Fund - Establishment

MD HB75

Maryland Technology Development Corporation - Digital Bay Business Diversity Program - Establishment

MD SB856

Economic Development – Maryland Stadium Authority – Baltimore City Infrastructure Projects

MD HB1128

Economic Development - Maryland Stadium Authority - Baltimore City Infrastructure Projects

MD HB653

Economic Development - Maryland Technology Infrastructure Pilot Program - Establishment

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.