Tennessee House Bill HJR0770

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/22/24
• Refer: 1/24/24
• Refer: 1/31/24

Caption

A RESOLUTION to confirm the appointment of Michael Wade to the state university board of Middle Tennessee State University.

Impact

The passage of HJR0770 ensures that governance of Middle Tennessee State University is in line with state laws and regulations regarding board appointments. It reflects the state's commitment to maintaining oversight of key educational institutions and ensuring that board members have a vested interest in the university's success. The confirmation process is a crucial aspect of governance as it aligns appointees with the university's mission and state educational standards, supporting affirmative leadership and stakeholder representation.

Summary

House Joint Resolution 770 (HJR0770) pertains to the confirmation of Michael Wade's appointment to the state university board of Middle Tennessee State University. The bill provides a framework for the governance of Middle Tennessee State University, outlining the roles of gubernatorial appointees to the board. It specifies that the governor shall appoint eight members to this board, and includes stipulations related to the qualifications required for these appointees, such as being alumni and state residents. Michael Wade, appointed by Governor Bill Lee, is a notable alumnus of the university and brings significant business experience to the role.

Contention

There is little public contention specifically noted around HJR0770, as it focuses on a specific appointment rather than broad-reaching policy changes. Supporters likely view Wade's background in business and support for the university as beneficial to its strategic direction. However, any appointment confirmation could face scrutiny regarding the qualifications of appointees and their alignment with the needs of the university community. Given the context of educational priorities in Tennessee, such confirmations could become a local political point if stakeholders feel the appointees do not adequately represent student interests or diversity in leadership.