Maryland 2024 Regular Session

Maryland Senate Bill SB972

Introduced
2/2/24  
Refer
2/2/24  
Report Pass
3/14/24  
Engrossed
3/15/24  
Refer
3/16/24  
Report Pass
4/2/24  
Enrolled
4/4/24  
Chaptered
4/25/24  

Caption

Correctional Officers' Retirement System - Membership

Impact

The proposed changes in SB972 could significantly impact state laws regarding retirement and pension systems for employees in the correctional field. By incorporating more employees into the Correctional Officers’ Retirement System, the bill broadens eligibility and provides additional retirement benefits to a larger group of state employees. This could result in increased financial obligations for the state due to higher payouts of retirement benefits, and may also attract more individuals to pursue careers in correctional services, knowing they have more robust retirement options available.

Summary

Senate Bill 972 seeks to modify the membership criteria of the Correctional Officers’ Retirement System in Maryland. The bill proposes to include certain employees from the Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services and the Maryland Department of Health into this retirement system. A significant feature of the bill is that it allows transferred members to receive creditable service for any unused sick leave accrued under either the State Employees’ Retirement System or the State Employees’ Pension System. This addition aims to enhance the benefits available to correctional officers and related personnel.

Sentiment

The response from legislative discussions surrounding SB972 appears to be largely positive, with support coming from various parties who recognize the importance of providing comprehensive retirement benefits to those working in high-stress environments like corrections and public safety. This sentiment reflects a broader recognition of the challenges faced by these workers, and the need for legislation that supports their long-term well-being. However, there may also be concerns about the financial implications and the state’s ability to sustain increased retirement benefits over time.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise from the financial implications associated with expanding the membership of the retirement system. Critics might raise concerns about the long-term sustainability of the retirement system and potential impacts on the state's budget. Additionally, there may be debates on whether all employees eligible for this expanded membership are equally deserving of the benefits, especially in the context of roles that may differ significantly in terms of risk and work environment. The balance between providing necessary support to correctional officers while managing state resources effectively will likely remain a discussion point.

Companion Bills

MD HB1005

Crossfiled Correctional Officers' Retirement System - Membership

Previously Filed As

MD HB1005

Correctional Officers' Retirement System - Membership

MD HB763

Correctional Officers’ Retirement System – Membership

MD SB231

Correctional Officers' Retirement System - Membership

Similar Bills

MD HB1005

Correctional Officers' Retirement System - Membership

MD SB768

Correctional Officers' Retirement System - Membership - Clarifications

MD HB1029

Correctional Officers' Retirement System - Membership - Clarifications

MD SB2

Mental Health Law – Petitions for Emergency Evaluation – Electronic Record

MD HB32

Mental Health Law – Petitions for Emergency Evaluation – Electronic Record

MD HB908

Mental Health - Emergency Evaluations - Modification to Peace Officer Transport Requirement

MD HB1019

Mental Health Law - Petitions for Emergency Evaluation

MD HB763

Correctional Officers’ Retirement System – Membership