Tennessee House Bill HB2118

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/24/24
• Refer: 1/29/24
• Refer: 3/12/24
• Refer: 3/27/24
• Refer: 4/8/24
• Engrossed: 4/16/24
• Enrolled: 4/30/24
• Passed: 5/21/24
• Chaptered: 5/28/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4, Chapter 29; Title 59; Title 60; Title 65 and Title 68, relative to energy policy.

Impact

If enacted, HB2118 will significantly reshape Tennessee's energy policy framework by establishing a state energy policy council composed of representatives from various sectors, including energy producers and environmental organizations. This council aims to facilitate energy resource planning and coordination among different stakeholders. The focus on nuclear energy development is particularly notable, aligning with national efforts to promote safe and reliable nuclear energy pathways. The bill recognizes the state's economic growth potential tied to energy development and seeks to enhance Tennessee's position as a leader in energy production.

Summary

House Bill 2118 is an act designed to amend certain sections of the Tennessee Code Annotated concerning state energy policy. The bill emphasizes the necessity for a comprehensive and unified approach to managing energy resources in Tennessee, particularly highlighting the importance of reliable, affordable, and environmentally responsible energy infrastructure. It aims to enhance the state's capabilities in energy production by promoting domestic energy resources, including renewable sources and alternative energy solutions, such as nuclear. The intention is to ensure that the energy needs of the state are met efficiently and effectively.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB2118 appears supportive among stakeholders interested in energy production and economic growth. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary measure for modernizing Tennessee's energy infrastructure, fostering innovation in energy technologies, and maintaining competitive energy prices for consumers. However, there may be concerns related to environmental oversight and the long-term effects of increased nuclear energy reliance, which could lead to divided opinions among environmental advocacy groups and some community members.

Contention

One significant point of contention is the focus on nuclear energy as a primary driver of Tennessee's energy future. Critics may question whether sufficient safety measures and regulatory frameworks are in place to manage the potential risks associated with nuclear energy production. Furthermore, the formation of the state energy policy council raises questions about representation and stakeholder involvement in energy decisions, with some groups potentially feeling overlooked or inadequately represented in the policymaking process. This debate around governance and energy production methods will likely play a crucial role in the ongoing discussions surrounding the bill.