AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 9; Title 16; Title 20; Title 29; Title 37; Title 39; Title 62; Title 63; Title 68 and Title 71, relative to abortion.
Impact
The passage of HB 2052 would significantly influence state laws concerning the handling and preservation of records related to abortions. By mandating a longer retention period for these records, the bill could facilitate better tracking and understanding of abortion trends and outcomes, which advocates argue is important for public health data collection and policy-making. It may also create additional responsibilities for clinics and providers regarding record-keeping, potentially impacting operational practices in these facilities.
Summary
House Bill 2052 aims to amend various sections of the Tennessee Code Annotated relating to abortion. One of the primary provisions of the bill includes a requirement that the commissioner must maintain each record or report associated with abortion cases for a minimum of fifteen years. This proposed change reflects a legislative effort to enhance oversight and accountability in abortion-related activities and reporting within the state.
Sentiment
The discussion surrounding HB 2052 appears to evoke mixed sentiments. Supporters of the bill likely view it as a step towards ensuring thorough documentation and accountability in abortion services, reinforcing the notion that such information is vital for public welfare and health safety. Conversely, opponents may express concerns around privacy and the implications of record retention on individuals seeking abortion services, fueling sentiments against perceived overreach by the government.
Contention
Notable points of contention may arise concerning the implications of longer record retention on patient confidentiality and access to abortion services. Critics may argue that such mandates could deter individuals from seeking necessary reproductive health services, fearing their information is stored for an extended period. The debate underscores a broader conflict between regulatory oversight and individual rights, prompting discussions on the balance between accountability in healthcare and protecting personal privacy.
Crossfiled
AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 9; Title 16; Title 20; Title 29; Title 37; Title 39; Title 62; Title 63; Title 68 and Title 71, relative to abortion.
AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 9; Title 16; Title 20; Title 29; Title 37; Title 39; Title 62; Title 63; Title 68 and Title 71, relative to abortion.
AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4; Title 9; Title 29; Title 33; Title 37; Title 38; Title 39; Title 40; Title 53; Title 56; Title 62; Title 63; Title 68 and Title 71, relative to abortion.
AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4; Title 9; Title 29; Title 33; Title 37; Title 38; Title 39; Title 40; Title 53; Title 56; Title 62; Title 63; Title 68 and Title 71, relative to abortion.
AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4; Title 29; Title 33; Title 37; Title 38; Title 39; Title 40; Title 53; Title 56; Title 62; Title 63; Title 68 and Title 71, relative to abortion.
AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4; Title 29; Title 33; Title 37; Title 38; Title 39; Title 40; Title 53; Title 56; Title 62; Title 63; Title 68 and Title 71, relative to abortion.
AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4; Title 29; Title 33; Title 37; Title 39; Title 40; Title 53; Title 56; Title 62; Title 63; Title 68 and Title 71, relative to women's health.