AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 47, Chapter 18, relative to protecting minors from social media.
Impact
Should SB 2097 be enacted, it will amend Tennessee's existing statutes to impose specific requirements on social media companies regarding how they handle accounts for minors. This includes implementing systems to verify user ages and ensuring that parental consent is acquired for account creation. Failure to comply with these regulations may result in enforcement actions initiated by the attorney general, which adds another layer of accountability for social media companies operating within Tennessee.
Summary
Senate Bill 2097, known as the Protecting Minors from Social Media Act, aims to enhance the safety of minors in the digital space by instituting strict regulations on social media platforms. The bill mandates that social media companies verify the age of users attempting to create accounts. If a user is identified as a minor, parental consent must be provided before allowing the minor to open an account. The bill is intended to prevent minors from accessing potentially harmful content and ensure they are using these services with appropriate adult supervision.
Sentiment
The sentiment towards SB 2097 is mixed among lawmakers and advocacy groups. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step towards protecting children in an increasingly digital world, where exposure to inappropriate content and online predation poses real threats. Conversely, critics express concerns about the feasibility of enforcing age verification processes, potential privacy implications, and the risks of overreaching government regulation on free expression in online venues.
Contention
Notable points of contention around SB 2097 focus on the practicality and enforcement mechanisms stipulated in the bill. Critics argue that requiring social media companies to verify parental consent and user age may lead to information security issues and a burden on businesses to implement these systems. Moreover, concerns are raised about the likelihood of excluding underprivileged minors who may not have parental figures readily available to provide consent, thereby potentially limiting their access to digital services critical for education and social interaction.