Requires State agency to identify at least two existing rules for repeal for every one new rule adopted.
Impact
If passed, SB 2281 will have significant implications across various state sectors where regulations are currently in place. Agencies must undertake a comprehensive evaluation of existing regulations whenever introducing new rules, emphasizing a commitment to reduce the regulatory burden. The requirement for public disclosure and a structured process for repeals aims to enhance transparency and accountability in government actions. This could potentially lead to fewer regulations in various sectors, ensuring that businesses can operate under a more predictable and manageable regulatory environment, ultimately promoting economic growth.
Summary
Senate Bill 2281, introduced in the New Jersey Legislature, aims to reform the state rulemaking process by establishing a requirement for state agencies to repeal at least two existing rules for every new rule adopted. This bill seeks to streamline regulatory practices, thereby making them more efficient and manageable. The intent is to prevent the accumulation of regulations, which can often lead to increasing operational costs for businesses and governmental agencies. By mandating this repeal-per-new-rule framework, the bill fosters a more thoughtful approach to regulatory changes, aligning New Jersey's process with similar initiatives at the federal level, specifically referencing Executive Order No. 13771 issued by the Trump administration.
Contention
However, the bill is not without controversy. Opponents argue that the bill may undervalue critical protections that existing regulations provide, particularly in public health and environmental sectors. There are concerns that the forced repeal of regulations could lead to reduced oversight and accountability, consequently risking safety and well-being for citizens. Critics further emphasize that a simplistic approach to regulatory cuts does not consider the complexity and necessity of certain regulatory frameworks that require continuity and robust enforcement. Thus, while SB 2281 aims for efficiency and cost control, discussions surrounding its potential consequences show a divide between the desire for deregulation and the need for effective governance.
Requires State compensation of property owners for certain property devalued due to certain environmental laws; and requires State agencies to evaluate proposed administrative rules for potential to constitute taking of real property.
Requires State compensation of property owners for certain property devalued due to certain environmental laws; and requires State agencies to evaluate proposed administrative rules for potential to constitute taking of real property.