Requires State agency to identify at least two existing rules for repeal for every one new rule adopted.
If enacted, A3896 would significantly shift the way state agencies approach rule adoption. Agencies would need to provide thorough rationalizations for new rules and demonstrate how existing laws would be eliminated to accommodate them. This process could potentially slow down the rule-making timeline, requiring additional planning and foresight from agencies. Furthermore, it may impact the socio-economic landscape by ensuring no new rule can excessively increase compliance costs on businesses or citizens, as it mandates an offset through repeals. The public will also benefit from increased transparency, as agencies must provide notice and allow public input before adopting new rules.
A3896 is a proposed bill in New Jersey that mandates state agencies to identify at least two existing rules for repeal for every new rule adopted. The law aims to streamline the regulatory process by limiting the net increase in rules, prompting agencies to consider existing regulations and their implications before enacting new ones. The bill is modeled after a similar executive order from the Trump administration, reflecting a national trend towards regulatory reform. By establishing this requirement, the bill seeks to encourage a more meticulous and efficient approach to rule-making that can help reduce the regulatory burden on businesses and the public sector alike.
The bill's core contention lies in balancing the need for regulatory oversight with the potential for overreach that might stifle necessary regulations. Proponents argue it will enhance efficiency and reduce unnecessary regulations, thereby fostering economic growth. Critics, however, may contend that this could hinder the adoption of new regulations needed to respond promptly to emerging public health and safety concerns. The requirement to repeal rules may prevent important regulations from being implemented, especially in areas that need urgent attention or have historically faced lack of oversight.