AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 16; Title 33; Title 41 and Title 68, relative to mental health services.
Impact
If passed, HB2901 will solidify legally defined processes regarding the detention and treatment of individuals facing mental health crises in Tennessee. It modifies sections of the Tennessee Code Annotated, making it a requirement that less invasive options must be considered and deemed unsuitable before detaining an individual. This approach aims to balance the need for public safety with the rights of individuals experiencing mental health challenges, potentially influencing how mental health services are administered at a state level.
Summary
House Bill 2901 aims to amend existing Tennessee laws regarding the care and treatment of individuals with mental health issues. Specifically, the bill provides conditions under which a person with a mental illness or serious emotional disturbance can be detained for examination and treatment. It establishes a framework that requires a determination of imminent substantial likelihood of serious harm before a person can be detained, emphasizing the need for available less drastic alternatives prior to such actions. This amendment is significant as it seeks to clarify the circumstances under which mental health interventions can take place.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB2901 appears to be generally supportive among legislators, as evidenced by the unanimous vote in favor during its recent passage. Those backing the bill see it as a necessary response to the growing concerns about mental health interventions while also aiming to respect individual rights. However, some advocacy groups and mental health professionals may express concerns regarding implementation and the nuances involved in assessing imminent harm, highlighting the need for adequate support and training for those responsible for these assessments.
Contention
Notable points of contention related to HB2901 may arise from discussions around the definitions of 'imminent substantial likelihood of serious harm' and the stipulation of evaluating less drastic alternatives. Critics may argue that the criteria set forth in the bill could lead to subjective interpretations that vary widely in practice. There might also be concerns regarding the adequacy of resources and training for mental health professionals, which are essential to support the successful implementation of the law.
AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 2; Title 4; Title 8; Title 12; Title 13; Title 33; Title 34; Title 37; Title 40; Title 41; Title 45; Title 49; Title 52; Title 55; Title 56; Title 63; Title 67; Title 68; Title 71 and Chapter 1100 of the Public Acts of 2010, relative to the Tennessee Disability and Aging Act of 2024.
AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 2; Title 4; Title 8; Title 12; Title 13; Title 33; Title 34; Title 37; Title 40; Title 41; Title 45; Title 49; Title 52; Title 55; Title 56; Title 63; Title 67; Title 68; Title 71 and Chapter 1100 of the Public Acts of 2010, relative to the Tennessee Disability and Aging Act of 2024.